Professor Vaishali, the chairperson of the Faculty Academic Committee (FAC), was trying to understand the implications of decisions taken by the student placement committee (SPC) on placement issues. It was alleged that Bishan, a final year student, inflated his grades in his biodata that was sent to the recruiters. The president of SPC requested the FAC to debar Bishan from the campus recruitment process. When the matter was brought up for discussion in FAC, one of the professors remarked that Bishan too should be allowed to defend himself. When Bishan arrived for the meeting the situation became even more challenging. Bishan raised the issue that many other students who had misrepresented grades to get coveted jobs had gone scot-free. He alleged that these students were close to the president of SPC and therefore no action was taken against them. He stated that somebody has deliberately manipulated his grades in the biodata. This allegation confused the members and it was decided to adjourn the meeting. Vaishali was to decide on the next course of action.   It was found that a large section of the students have been indulging in such practices. Unfortunately, the HR. manager of a much coveted campus recruiter, who is an alumnus of the college, came to know about this. Considering yourself in the position of that HR. manager. What would be your reaction?   (a) express your displeasure and stop any further recruitment from the college (b) talk to you contact in the college and try to find out the truth (c) ask the college to send fresh set of biodata as you wanted verified grades of the students (d) ask the SPC to resend the details of the short listed students including their verified grades.

Question ID - 53345 | SaraNextGen Top Answer

Professor Vaishali, the chairperson of the Faculty Academic Committee (FAC), was trying to understand the implications of decisions taken by the student placement committee (SPC) on placement issues. It was alleged that Bishan, a final year student, inflated his grades in his biodata that was sent to the recruiters. The president of SPC requested the FAC to debar Bishan from the campus recruitment process. When the matter was brought up for discussion in FAC, one of the professors remarked that Bishan too should be allowed to defend himself. When Bishan arrived for the meeting the situation became even more challenging. Bishan raised the issue that many other students who had misrepresented grades to get coveted jobs had gone scot-free. He alleged that these students were close to the president of SPC and therefore no action was taken against them. He stated that somebody has deliberately manipulated his grades in the biodata. This allegation confused the members and it was decided to adjourn the meeting. Vaishali was to decide on the next course of action.   It was found that a large section of the students have been indulging in such practices. Unfortunately, the HR. manager of a much coveted campus recruiter, who is an alumnus of the college, came to know about this. Considering yourself in the position of that HR. manager. What would be your reaction?   (a) express your displeasure and stop any further recruitment from the college (b) talk to you contact in the college and try to find out the truth (c) ask the college to send fresh set of biodata as you wanted verified grades of the students (d) ask the SPC to resend the details of the short listed students including their verified grades.