Question ID - 84119 | SaraNextGen Top Answer

Read the passages carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.                                                                         PASSAGE      The Law is an ass, declared Mr. Bumble in Oliver Twist, and it often seems he was right. For punishment does not always fit the crime and it rarely happens that a prison term reforms a criminal”.      Consider the following two cases. The first one had happened in a village in Madurai District. One Gopal yadhav, a hard-core criminal undergoing life sentence in the Madurai Prison some out on bail for two days to perform the last rites of his mother. But he was rearrested on the same evening on the charges of murdering his neighbour’s son to settle old scores.      The second case too came to Madurai Court recently. Deserted by her husband a drunkard, his grief-stricken wife mixed rat poison in the food and gave it to her four children aged between 1  and 9 years. Before she could swallow the same food, she was unable to bear the pitiable sight of her children writhing in pain. She rushed them to hospital where she disclosed everything. She was able to save the lives of the first three children, but the law of the country awarded her two years imprisonment (later commuted to one year) on the charges of plotting to kill her children. Would you say women like her are a danger to the society? Would you call them criminals? It is high time that we found other ways of registering our disapproval of wrong doing. To imprison the bad is expedient – when they are dangerous. To imprison the mad and the merely sad, as we do, is not only unnecessary, it is uncivilized.
The writer says The Law is an ass because
(a)	it is as patient as an ass.	(b)	it does not punish the criminals severely.
(c)	punishments do not help to reform criminals.	(d)	criminals can escape punishment.
Gopal Yadhav came out on bail
(a)	in order to murder his enemy.	(b)	to cremate his mother.
(c)	so that he could be rearrested.	(d)	to see his four children under-going treatment in the hospital.
The mother in the second case cannot be called a criminal because she
(a)	rushed her children to the hospital.	(b)	mixed an ineffective poison in the food.
(c)	was able to save three out of four children.	(d)	was deserted by her husband.
The writer argues that punishments for people like the woman in the second case are not necessary because they
(a)	don’t commit crimes frequently.	(b)	are less dangerous than other criminals.
(c)	represent poor society.	(d)	should not be clubbed with other criminals.
The main difference between the two cases is
(a)	the first is about a man and the other is about a woman.	(b)	the woman regrets what she has done, but not the man.
(c)	the man is a lifer but the woman is not.	(d)	the man and the woman belong to different communities.