Statement 1: |
There are two propellers in a helicopter |
Statement 2: |
Angular momentum is conserved |
a) |
Statement 1 is True, Statement 2 is True; Statement 2 is correct explanation for Statement 1 |
b) |
Statement 1 is True, Statement 2 is True; Statement 2 is not correct explanation for Statement 1 |
c) |
Statement 1 is True, Statement 2 is False |
d) |
Statement 1 is False, Statement 2 is True |
Statement 1: |
There are two propellers in a helicopter |
Statement 2: |
Angular momentum is conserved |
a) |
Statement 1 is True, Statement 2 is True; Statement 2 is correct explanation for Statement 1 |
b) |
Statement 1 is True, Statement 2 is True; Statement 2 is not correct explanation for Statement 1 |
c) |
Statement 1 is True, Statement 2 is False |
d) |
Statement 1 is False, Statement 2 is True |
(b) Both, assertion and reason are true but the reason is not a correct explanation of the statement-1. Infact, if helicopter has only one propeller, the helicopter itself would turn in opposite direction to conserve the angular momentum |